Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2018)264 - Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union for certain agricultural and industrial products - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2018)264 - Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2018)264  |
| date | 07-05-2018 |
1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
• Reasons for and objectives of the proposal
Autonomous tariff quotas are needed for certain products when production in the European Union is insufficient to meet the needs of the user industry in the Union. Union tariff quotas should be opened at zero or reduced duty rates for appropriate volumes, without disturbing the markets for such products.
On 17 December 2013, the Council of the European Union adopted Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013 opening and providing for the management of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union for certain agricultural and industrial products so that the Union demand for the products in question could be met under the most favourable conditions.
The Regulation is updated every six months to accommodate the needs of Union industry. The Commission, assisted by the Economic Tariff Questions Group, has reviewed all requests from the Member States for autonomous tariff quotas duties.
Following this review, the Commission considers that the opening of autonomous tariff quotas is justified for some new products, currently not listed in the Annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013. In relation to some other products, the product description has to be modified to take into account the latest technical developments, or the initial quota volume has to be adjusted.
• Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area
This proposal does not affect countries that have a preferential trading agreement with the Union nor - candidate countries or potential candidates for preferential agreements with the Union (e.g. Generalised System of Preferences; the African, Caribbean and Pacific group trade regime; Free Trade Agreements).
• Consistency with other Union policies
The proposal is in line with Union policies on agriculture, trade, enterprise, development, environment, and external relations.
2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY
• Legal basis
The legal basis of this proposal is Article 31 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
• Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)
The proposal falls under the Union's exclusive competence. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply.
• Proportionality
The proposal complies with the principle of proportionality. The measures envisaged are in line with the principles for simplifying procedures for operators engaged in foreign trade, as stated in the Commission communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas 1 . This Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives pursued in accordance with Article 5 i of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
• Choice of the instrument
By virtue of Article 31 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), 'Common Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council on a proposal from the Commission'. Therefore, a regulation is the appropriate instrument.
3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
• Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation
The autonomous tariff quotas scheme was part of an evaluation study carried out in 2013 on autonomous tariff suspensions 2 .
This is because the two measures are similar, except that quotas limit import volumes. The evaluation concluded that the core rationale for the scheme remains valid. The cost savings for Union businesses importing goods under the scheme can be significant. In turn, depending on the product, company and sector, these savings can have wider benefits, such as boosting competitiveness, making production methods more efficient, and creating or keeping jobs in the Union. Details of the savings of this regulation can be found in the attached legislative financial statement.
• Stakeholder consultations
The Economic Tariff Questions Group, which consists of delegations from all Member States plus Turkey, assisted the Commission to assess this proposal. The group met three times before agreeing the changes in this proposal.
It carefully assessed each request (new, or for an amendment). It particularly examined each case to ensure that it was not causing any harm to Union producers and was strengthening and consolidating the competitiveness of Union's production. The members of the Economic Tariff Questions Group carried out the assessment through discussions, and Member States consulted the concerned industries, associations, chambers of commerce and other stakeholders involved.
All listed quotas were the subject of agreements or compromises reached in the discussions held at the Economic Tariff Questions Group. No potentially serious risks with irreversible consequences were mentioned.
• Impact assessment
The proposed amendment is of a purely technical nature and concerns only the coverage of quotas listed in the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 1388/2013. Therefore, no impact assessment was carried out for this proposal.
• Fundamental rights
The proposal has no consequences on fundamental rights.
4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
This proposal has no financial impact on expenditure but has a financial impact on revenue which leads to uncollected customs duties of a total amount of approximately EUR 0,8 million per year. The negative effect on the traditional own resources of the budget is EUR 0,6 million per year (80 % of EUR 0,8 million per year).
The loss of revenue in traditional own resources shall be compensated by Member States’ Gross National Income (GNI) based on resource contributions.
5. OTHER ELEMENTS
• Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements
The measures proposed are managed within the framework of the Integrated Tariff of the European Union (TARIC) and applied by the Member States’ customs administrations.